1. Foreword: How much productivity can the energy efficiency core bring to the 12th generation Core?
The new generation of Core processors (Alder Lake) has fully upgraded the process architecture, and the IPC performance has increased by 19%. This is enough to be amazing. What is more interesting is that the energy-efficient core has been added, and the multi-threading performance has also increased.
The 12th generation of Core is so powerful that it is even a bit unbelievable! Even the mid-range i5-12600K processor, its single-core performance and multi-core performance have also been greatly improved. For Intel fans, they have not seen such a big performance improvement for many years.
In the first test of the 12th-generation Core processor, we mainly tested the theoretical performance and game performance of i9-12900K and i5-12600K, and the productivity test involved less.
This time we will conduct related tests on productivity. The projects include our common rendering tools, video editing tools and CrossMark & ​​PugetBench family bucket.
Let's take a look at the productivity improvement of the new generation of processors with the core of energy efficiency!
In this test, in addition to examining the 12-generation Core i9-12900K and i5-12600K, it also added the corresponding i9-11900K and i5-11600K of the previous generation to see how much the improvement is.
The test graphics card is ASUS TUF RTX3080Ti O12G GAMING, and the memory is Zhiqi Ripjaws S5 DDR5-5200 16GB×2.
2. Rendering performance test 1. It is an open source cross-platform all-round 3D animation production software, providing a series of animation short film production solutions from modeling, animation, material, rendering, to audio processing, and video editing.
And Blender BenchMark is a free program used to test CPU/GPU rendering performance.
The score is 8 minutes and 50 seconds, which is 530 seconds.
The score is 13 minutes and 37 seconds, which is 817 seconds.
It takes seconds to complete the test, which is 54% faster than i9-11900K, and the rendering performance of i5-12600K is basically the same as i9-11900K.
2. With excellent rendering quality and speed, it can be used as a plug-in by software such as 3Dsmax and C4D.
The score is 8767297Rays/sec.
The score is 5249486Rays/sec.
The result is a great success, 67% faster than i9-11900K. i5-12600K is also about 7% faster than i9-11900K.
3. The score is 27710.
The score is 16,733.
It is also 67% faster than i9-11900K, while i5-12600K is slightly stronger than i9-11900K and 3% faster than the latter.
4. X265 is a high-efficiency video encoding that has emerged in recent years. It can reduce the capacity of high-definition video by about 40% while maintaining the same image quality as X264 encoding. At present, high-definition movies based on X265 encoding have begun to replace the original position of X264 encoding and become the mainstream encoding technology for network high-definition video.
The transcoding speed of i9-11900K is 65% faster than i9-11900K, and i5-12600K is about 6% faster than i9-11900K.
5. In the CineBench R20 test, the rendering speed of i9-12900K is 70% faster than i9-11900K. i5-12600K is also 8% faster than i9-11900K.
6. In the CineBench R23 test, i9-12900K is 62% faster than i9-11900K. The i5-12600K is nearly 10% faster than the previous flagship i9-11900K and 58% faster than the i5-11600K.
3. CrossMark and PugetBench family bucket test 1. It is a benchmark software developed by the BAPCo organization, covering the three dimensions of creativity, productivity and response speed, and has high requirements for the single-threaded performance of the processor. The test data of this software can reflect the processing efficiency of the computer's daily affairs.
The total score is 2250.
The total score is 1857.
It is biased towards daily use, and there is no big gap between several processors. i9-12900K is about 20% stronger than i9-11900K, and i5-12600K is also 10% stronger than i9-11900K.
2. A video editing and design software is an indispensable auxiliary tool for the production of dynamic image design, and it is also a professional non-linear editing software for video post-synthesis processing. It has a wide range of applications, covering movies, movies, advertisements, multimedia, and web pages. Many of the most popular computer games nowadays use it for synthesis.
AE is a productivity application that depends on CPU performance. i9-12900K is 18% faster than i9-11900K, and i5-12600K is slightly better than i9-11900K by 1%.
3. It is a picture processing software similar to Photoshop. Compared with PS, LR is more focused on photo post-processing, and it is easy to get started. For people without any picture processing experience, they can easily edit better photos.
The total score is 1275, which is 32% stronger than i9-11900K. The i5-12600K scored 1158, which is also stronger than the i9-11900K, leading by 20%.
4. Needless to say, the famous Photoshop, the total score of i9-12900K is 1421, which is 26% faster than i9-11900K.
The total score is 1239, which is 10% faster than i9-11900K.
5. It is currently the most widely used video editing software. It is currently widely used in advertising production and TV program production. This software can complete video collection, editing, color correction, audio beautification, subtitle addition, video transcoding, etc.
The total score is 1225, which is 35% faster than i9-11900K. The total score of i5-12600K is 987, which is about 10% faster than i9-11900K.
The test data is summarized as follows: The productivity test is not the same as the theoretical test. Many applications cannot fully load the CPU, such as CrossMark and PugetBench. In these applications, the 12th-generation Core is naturally at ease.
Based on all test data, in terms of productivity, i9-12900K is nearly 50% stronger than i9-11900K, i5-12600K is also stronger than i9-11900K, leading by about 8% overall, and 35% ahead of i5-11600K .
The progress of the 12th generation Core is definitely rare in recent years.
Fourth, game performance comparison: of course, the undisputed king, users who buy i9-12900K and i5-12600K processors, in addition to productivity content creation, also have leisure needs, such as playing games, and game performance is also An excellent example of the potential of the 12th generation Core.
So here we add a part of the test to see how much the game performance of the 12th generation Core has been improved.
1. Assassin’s Creed: Hall of Valor For mid-to-high-end processors, the bottleneck of "Assassin’s Creed: Hall of Valor" at 1080 resolution lies in the graphics card, and the gap between several processors is not too big.
The frame rate reached 116FPS, which is 5 frames higher than i9-11900K, leading by 4%. The frame rate of i5-12600K is 110FPS, which is 1 frame less than i9-11900K.
2. German Army Headquarters: Although the new bloodline has a game frame rate of more than 400 frames at 1080P resolution, the four processors still haven't opened a big gap.
The strongest, but only 2% faster than i9-11900K. The frame rate of I5-12600K reaches 438FPS, which is about 3% less than that of i9-12900K.
3. Far Cry 6 In "Far Cry 6", the frame rate of i9-12900K has reached 141FPS, which is an absolute leader. Compared with i9-11900K, it has 15 frames more, and the lead has reached 12%.
The frame rate is 126FPS, the same as i9-11900K.
4. Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Shadow In the test of "Shadow of the Tomb Raider", the frame rate of i9-12900K reached 211FPS, which is 9 frames higher than i9-11900K, leading by 4%.
The frame rate is 190FPS, which is 12 frames less than i9-11900K, and the gap is 6%.
5. Ashes of the Singularity In the test of Ashes of the Singularity, the frame rate of i9-12900K is 169FPS, which is 13FPS higher than that of i9-11900K, leading by 8%.
The frame rate is 152FPS, which is 2% worse than i9-12900K.
6. Total War: Three Kingdoms In "Total War: Three Kingdoms", the frame rate of i9-12900K is 167FPS, which is 7 frames higher than i9-11900K.
The frame rate is 156FPS, which is 4 frames less than i9-11900K.
7. The 12th generation Core of World of Tanks has an absolute advantage in the test of "World of Tanks". The frame rate of i9-12900K has reached 387FPS, which is 15% higher than i9-11900K.
The frame rate is also 350FPS, which is 14 frames higher than i9-11900K, leading by 4%.
8. CS: GO This is the frame rate of i9-12900K, 770FPS.
This is the frame rate of i5-12600K, 681FPS.
In the "CS: GO" test, the 12th generation Core also has a clear advantage. The frame rate of i9-12900K is as high as 770FPS, which is 19% ahead of the i9-11900K.
Its frame rate is also 682FPS, which is 6% faster than i9-11900K.
The game test data is summarized as follows: It is the undisputed top game processor, can run the highest frame rate in all game tests, and is 8% better than i9-11900K in performance.
The situation is a bit complicated. It lags slightly behind i9-11900K in most stand-alone games, and has achieved a go-ahead in online games like "CS: GO" and "World of Tanks". In general, its gaming performance is 1% weaker than i9-11900K, but it is still much stronger than i5-11600K, with a 6% lead.
V. Summary: Not only the strongest gaming processor. Before the release of the 12th generation i9-12900K processor, the 11th generation Core i9-11900K processor has always held the title of super single-core performance processor, but it is also super powerful. Now, the new generation of i9-12900K has firmly consolidated this position. It is difficult to have an opponent in a short period of time. Even the mainstream i5-12600K has reached an unprecedented height.
In terms of productivity and performance, the full-blooded i9-12900K is naturally invincible in the world, and the i5-12600K processor with 10 cores has a remarkable overall performance. It has surpassed the previous generation flagship i9-11900K by about 8%, which is better than the i9-11900K. i5-11600K is as much as 35% stronger.
Due to the larger secondary cache and tertiary cache, the frame rate of i5-12600K for playing online games is much stronger than that of i9-11900K, but the performance of stand-alone games is slightly weaker. On the whole, the game performance of the two is basically at the same level.
As for the i9-12900K processor, there is no doubt that it is a super powerful gaming processor, and its gaming performance is 8% higher than that of the i9-11900K.
Although this number does not seem large, we must know that the i9-11900K itself has top-level gaming performance, and the ASUS RTX 3080 Ti used in our test platform actually has a performance bottleneck, and the i9-12900K can still be achieved in this case. An 8% increase in game performance is not an easy task.
Of course, the bigger highlight of the i9-12900K is its powerful multi-threading performance. In terms of rendering performance, i9-12900K is about 70% stronger than i9-11900K. In daily use, video editing, and image processor performance, there is also an increase of about 30%.
After adding the energy-efficient core, the multi-threading performance of the 12th-generation Core processor has been greatly improved, which allows it to flex its muscles in the field of productivity.
Now, the new generation of Core processors is more than just a super game processor!

    内容分页 1 2
声明:本站所有文章,如无特殊说明或标注,均为本站原创发布。任何个人或组织,在未征得本站同意时,禁止复制、盗用、采集、发布本站内容到任何网站、书籍等各类媒体平台。如若本站内容侵犯了原著者的合法权益,可联系我们进行处理。